Published
- 3 min read
Marsch on Canada exit: We were the better team

Marsch on Canada exit: We were the better team
Introduction
The Group E finale between the United States and Canada at the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup will be etched in the memories of fans for a long time. As the clock struck 90, the Americans secured a 1-0 win, sending them to the Round of 16, while the Canucks packed their bags, their tournament journey cut short. In the aftermath, US coach, Vlatko Andonovski, lauded his team’s performance, stating, “We were the better team.” In this article, we’ll delve into the tactical decisions that led to this outcome and what it means for the future of both teams.
Main Content
The match was a tactical masterclass, with both sides employing different strategies to gain an upper hand. The Americans started with a 4-3-3 formation, allowing for flexibility and width, while the Canadians opted for a more defensive 4-4-2, looking to nullify the US attack and catch them on the counter. The game plan was clear: suffocate the opposition’s midfield and use the speed of wingers to create chaos on the flanks.
As the match unfolded, the Americans’ midfield trio of Rose Lavelle, Kristie Mewis, and Lindsey Horan dominated possession, creating opportunities and stifling the Canadian attack. The US defense, marshaled by the experienced Abby Dahlkemper and Hailie Mace, repelled the Canadian threats with ease.
The turning point came in the 65th minute when US forward, Sophia Smith, capitalized on a defensive lapse to slot the ball past the Canadian goalkeeper. The goal was a culmination of the Americans’ relentless pressure and marked the difference between the two sides.
Key Takeaways
- Possession: The Americans controlled 62% of the game, showcasing their ability to maintain possession in midfield.
- Defensive solidity: The US defense, marshaled by Dahlkemper and Mace, allowed only 3 shots on target, restricting the Canadian attack.
- Midfield dominance: Lavelle, Mewis, and Horan’s midfield trio created 7 chances from open play, underscoring their influence on the game.
Conclusion
As the US team celebrated their hard-fought win, their coach, Vlatko Andonovski, was right – they were the better team. The Canadians, despite their valiant efforts, were unable to cope with the Americans’ tactical acumen and midfield prowess. This result has significant implications for both teams, with the US now set to face a tough opponent in the Round of 16, while the Canadians must regroup and refocus for their next challenge.
In the end, it was a case of “form over function,” with the Americans’ superior midfield performance and defensive solidity proving decisive. As the dust settles on this Group E finale, one thing is clear – the United States have set themselves up for a deep run in the tournament, while Canada’s exit will be a tough pill to swallow.